Looks like a Sandman Van on a Wb Chassis???

**Jeza** · 11-09-2011, 12:46 PM

Check this out, not long to go. Advertised as a WB. Definitely not a Wb shell clearly evident by the indicator holes in the rear quarter. Looks like holes in the rear for the full headlining rods aswell?

I've sent the bloke a message and it sounds as if he has done some 'tampering' and placed this shell on the WB chassis. Asked the the tag details which he didn't send, but said it was a 202 auto. Sounds as if they could have been swapped over also?

Hmmmm....

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/300595877...9#ht_500wt_922

Jeza

**ozbox** · 11-09-2011, 09:41 PM

that was a damn good buy...how could it be dodgy if its a sandman shell on a wb chassis..no one cares about wbs?...

**T-Dog** · 11-09-2011, 10:00 PM

great buy at $1800

**Vombil** · 11-09-2011, 10:08 PM

looks like good buying for the shell alone @ $1,800... what id give to have the volume of vans you buggers have there, here in the Wild West!

**Rico** · 12-09-2011, 08:54 AM

here here, good shell, makes mine look expensive!

looks as neat as

**wbute** · 12-09-2011, 09:32 AM

There was a thread on here earlier about that van. those in the know said it had the windows removed but they were not happy with the job so a new shell was aquired. Thats if my memory serves me correctly. Still a great buy however.

**Vombil** · 12-09-2011, 09:55 AM

Originally Posted by wbute

There was a thread on here earlier about that van. those in the know said it had the windows removed but they were not happy with the job so a new shell was aquired. Thats if my memory serves me correctly. Still a great buy however.

that exact thought ran through my head... why would a freshly painted shell be on the wrong chassis with odd bod bits n pieces tacked on??